On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 12:38:52PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 13 August 2015 at 12:23, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:38:00PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> >> On 13 August 2015 at 23:24, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 11:09:03PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
> >> >> Hi Simon,
> >> >>
> >> >> On 30 July 2015 at 11:04, Vignesh R <vigne...@ti.com> wrote:
> >> >> > From: Ravi Babu <ravib...@ti.com>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Use memalign() with ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN to allocate read buffers.
> >> >> > This is required because, flash drivers may use DMA for read 
> >> >> > operations
> >> >> > and may have to invalidate the buffer before read.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Ravi Babu <ravib...@ti.com>
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Vignesh R <vigne...@ti.com>
> >> >> > ---
> >> >> >  common/cmd_sf.c | 6 +++---
> >> >> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > diff --git a/common/cmd_sf.c b/common/cmd_sf.c
> >> >> > index 3746e0d9644f..ac7f5dfb8181 100644
> >> >> > --- a/common/cmd_sf.c
> >> >> > +++ b/common/cmd_sf.c
> >> >> > @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static int spi_flash_update(struct spi_flash 
> >> >> > *flash, u32 offset,
> >> >> >
> >> >> >         if (end - buf >= 200)
> >> >> >                 scale = (end - buf) / 100;
> >> >> > -       cmp_buf = malloc(flash->sector_size);
> >> >> > +       cmp_buf = memalign(ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN, flash->sector_size);
> >> >>
> >> >> I always have a confusion like align macro is never used on code
> >> >> memalign_simple()
> >> >> Was it a typo missing or some thing?
> >> >
> >> > Sorry?  We always call memalign() rather than memalign_simple().
> >>
> >> memalign() is calling memalign_simple() except __libc_memalign
> >>
> >> Am I missing something here, because ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN is never used
> >> on memalign_simple()
> >
> > Yes, unless I'm missing something now, memalign_simple() is only used on
> > CONFIG_SYS_MALLOC_SIMPLE which has some very specific use cases.  We
> > otherwise use memalign from common/dlmalloc.c..
> 
> It looks like memalign_simple()  should use
> 
>         addr = ALIGN(gd->malloc_base + gd->malloc_ptr, align);
> 
> instead of:
> 
>         addr = ALIGN(gd->malloc_base + gd->malloc_ptr, bytes);

Now we're getting somewhere, good spotting Jagan!

-- 
Tom

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to