Hi Bin,
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 5:14 PM, Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Saket,
>
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 7:33 PM, Saket Sinha <saket.sinh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Bin,
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 3:03 PM, Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Saket,
>>>
>>> On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Saket Sinha <saket.sinh...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>> This patch mainly adds ACPI support to QEMU.
>>>> Verified by booting Linux kernel on QEMU i440FX and Q35.
>>>
>>> I don't think ACPI is for i440FX. Although it boots, but that does not
>>> mean ACPI really works. These ASL files describing Q35 platform, not
>>> i440FX.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Saket Sinha <saket.sinh...@gmail.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> arch/x86/cpu/qemu/Makefile | 1 +
>>>> arch/x86/cpu/qemu/acpi.c | 179
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> 2 files changed, 180 insertions(+)
>>>> create mode 100644 arch/x86/cpu/qemu/acpi.c
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/qemu/Makefile b/arch/x86/cpu/qemu/Makefile
>>>> index 9a66b16..8c3884c 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/x86/cpu/qemu/Makefile
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/cpu/qemu/Makefile
>>>> @@ -8,4 +8,5 @@ ifndef CONFIG_EFI_STUB
>>>> obj-y += car.o dram.o
>>>> endif
>>>> obj-y += qemu.o
>>>> +obj-$(CONFIG_GENERATE_ACPI_TABLE) += acpi.o
>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_PCI) += pci.o
>>>> diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/qemu/acpi.c b/arch/x86/cpu/qemu/acpi.c
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..2496da7
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/cpu/qemu/acpi.c
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,179 @@
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2015, Saket Sinha <saket.sinh...@gmail.com>
>>>> + *
>>>> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
>>>> + */
>>>> +
>>>> +#include <common.h>
>>>> +#include <asm/acpi_table.h>
>>>> +#include <asm/ioapic.h>
>>>> +#include <asm/tables.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +void acpi_create_fadt(struct acpi_fadt *fadt, struct acpi_facs *facs,
>>>> + void *dsdt)
>>>> +{
>>>> + acpi_header_t *header = &(fadt->header);
>>>> + u16 pmbase;
>>>> +
>>>> + pci_dev_t bdf = PCI_BDF(0, 0x1f, 0);
>>>> + pci_read_config_word(bdf, 0x40, &pmbase);
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>
>>> Nits: misaligned
>>>
>>>> + * TODO(saket.sinh...@gmail.com): wrong value
>>>> + * of pmbase by above function. Harcoding it to
>>>
>>> Typo: Hardcoding
>>>
>>>> + * correct value. Since no PCI register is
>>>> + * programmed Power Management Interface is
>>>> + * not working
>>>> + */
>>>> +
>>>
>>> You still did not address this issue before sending v6. I don't
>>> understand why don't you just prepare a separate patch to program this
>>> PMBASE register by yourself. Are you waiting for me or Simon to do
>>> this, or are you looking for something else?
>>>
>>
>> As discussed with Simon, he wants me to come up with ACPI support on
>> Minnowmax
>> first and look up for QEMU fixes later before the deadline of this
>> program(GSOC) ends.
>>
>> Currently, I have been working on Minnowmax ACPI support and post a
>> workable patch for the same on mailing list ASAP.
>>
>> If you want me to currently stop on this activity and work on the Qemu
>> patch which programs PMBASE register first,
>> let us discuss it with Simon and plan accordingly.
>>
>
> OK, thanks for the update. It's better you'd send this clarification
> in your v5 patch thread which should have addressed my concern before
> sending v6.
>
> Frankly speaking, working on MinnowMax now without a basically working
> ACPI platform does not save us time. So far ACPI on QEMU is just
> partially working. We only addressed the Configuration part, but
> nothing in the Power management part was looked at. That's where this
> PMBASE is concerned.
I agree with you on this but what I believe is that if I post a
minimal working patch of minnowmax on the mailing list, others can
review and gauge the work done and current progress.
Let Simon has his opinion on this and then we can decide as to what
actions to take from here.
Regards,
Saket Sinha
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
