Hi Tom, Am 2015-09-15 18:54, schrieb Tom Rini: > Was there perhaps some sort of init ordering issue in a board which > did have EEPROM used as the backing store for env? I could see a > case where perhaps (and Ludger, can you test this as well please?) > the problem is that for env_eeprom env_init() needs to just default > to the built-in (like it's basically doing today) and > env_relocate_spec() needs to do the read, check which is valid, etc, > etc, dance which it is _not_ doing today. >
as I understand your idea, the code from both versions of env_init (redundant env and non-redunant) which is framed by "#ifdef ENV_IS_EMBEDDED" may potentially be moved to, or called by env_relocate_spec. I think this could work. If this ok for you, I can come up with a tested proposal. But this would need some days. Ludger _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot