On 09/25/2015 02:35 AM, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
Hello Stephen,
On 09/24/2015 07:14 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 09/24/2015 09:29 AM, Przemyslaw Marczak wrote:
After rework of lib/fdtdec.c by commit:
commit 02464e386bb5f0a022c121f95ae75cf583759d95
Author: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu Aug 6 15:31:02 2015 -0600
That'd usually be abbreviated as:
Commit 02464e386bb5 "fdt: add new fdt address parsing functions".
Ok, I will update the commit message.
Of course, if you want to shame me that's justified too:-) Tracking down
regressions sucks:-(
Oh no no... maybe a little :)
the function fdtdec_get_addr() doesn't work as previous,
because the implementation assumes that properties '#address-cells'
and '#size-cells' are equal to 1, which can be not true sometimes.
"are equal to" should be "is at least"; the purpose of that rework was
to support values greater than one.
But it describe the fdtdec_get_addr(), which calls
fdtdec_get_addr_size_fixed(...)
and for this call we have:
na = sizeof(fdt_addr_t) / sizeof(fdt32_t) == 1
ns = sizeof(fdt_size_t) / sizeof(fdt32_t) == 1
This is consistent with the description for this function in
include/fdtdec.h.
Ah yes; I was thinking of the core function
fdtdec_get_addr_size_fixed(). The description you gave seems correct.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
