Hi Wolfgang

On 02/10/15 10:42 AM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
Dear Fabio,

In message <1443792315-18997-1-git-send-email-feste...@gmail.com> you wrote:
...
Unlike i.MX and Vybrid, the watchdog controller on LS102x is big-endian.
...
+struct watchdog_regs {
+       u16     wcr;    /* Control */
+       u16     wsr;    /* Service */
+       u16     wrsr;   /* Reset Status */
+};
+
+#define WCR_SRS                (1 << 4)
This belongs to some watchdog (or processor) related header file.

As is, it duplicates code from drivers/watchdog/imx_watchdog.c which
is something we should not do.

diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/Makefile b/drivers/watchdog/Makefile
index 9e9cb55..a007ae8 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/Makefile
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
obj-$(CONFIG_AT91SAM9_WATCHDOG) += at91sam9_wdt.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_FTWDT010_WATCHDOG) += ftwdt010_wdt.o
-ifneq (,$(filter $(SOC), mx31 mx35 mx5 mx6 mx7 vf610 ls102xa))
+ifneq (,$(filter $(SOC), mx31 mx35 mx5 mx6 mx7 vf610))
So this fixes the reset problem for now - but what happens when
someone wants to use the watchdog for real?  Will we create a copy of
drivers/watchdog/imx_watchdog.c  using big-endian accessors?  This
cannot be right?

I don't know if you've seen my earlier e-mail on this but I was suggesting
to bring watchdog to DM and then consider endian type from dts to implement
it properly. Would this not ultimately be the right solution ?

  Regards
  Sinan Akman

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk


_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to