Hi Tom, On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 10:28:04AM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote: > >> From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.este...@freescale.com> >> >> The ffs64() implementation for powerpc is not found in the Linux kernel, >> so use the ffs64 header file from barebox. >> >> Imported from barebox v2015.10.0. >> >> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.este...@freescale.com> > > I'm confused. In the kernel __ffs64 is in <linux/bitops.h>, why do we > need to do things differently here?
It is true that kernel uses __ffs64 from <linux/bitops.h>, however in U-boot (and barebox) there is also ffs64 for powerpc, so that's why I added a new header for it. We have no ffs64 in kernel, only __ffs64. Regards, Fabio Estevam _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
