On 21 October 2015 at 14:42, Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > > Hi Stephen, > > On 21 October 2015 at 10:31, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: > > > > On 10/03/2015 08:30 AM, Simon Glass wrote: > >> > >> On 3 October 2015 at 00:44, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: > >>> > >>> From: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com> > >>> > >>> PCI addresses are always represented as 3 cells in DT. (one cell for bus > >>> and device, and two cells for a 64-bit addres). This does not vary based > >>> on either the physical address size of the CPU, nor any #address-cells > >>> property in DT (or more precisely, #address-cells must be set to 3 in any > >>> PCIe controller's node). > >>> > >>> Fix fdtdec_get_pci_addr() to use conversion functions that operate on > >>> (fixed) cell-sized data rather than (varying) physical-address-sized > >>> data, so that the function works on 64-bit systems. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com> > >>> --- > >>> lib/fdtdec.c | 14 +++++++------- > >>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > >> > >> > >> Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > > > > > Simon, this patch appears to be assigned to you in patchwork. Will you > > apply it now the merge window is open, or are you assuming it will go > > through the Tegra tree with all the PCIe patches? > > > > I can pick it up.
Applied to u-boot-dm. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
