On 17 November 2015 at 12:16, Jagan Teki <jt...@openedev.com> wrote:
> On 17 November 2015 at 11:57, Vignesh R <vigne...@ti.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/17/2015 11:33 AM, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>> On 10 November 2015 at 11:52, Vignesh R <vigne...@ti.com> wrote:
>>>> Add dummy readl after invalidating cmd field of QSPI_CMD_REG to ensure
>>>> bus sync. Without this device's CS is not deactivated reliably leading
>>>> to failure to enumerate flash or failure to set quad enable bit on
>>>> Macronix flash present on am437x-sk and am437x-idk evms.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Vignesh R <vigne...@ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  drivers/spi/ti_qspi.c | 2 ++
>>>>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/ti_qspi.c b/drivers/spi/ti_qspi.c
>>>> index bd63db8a2acc..ba2da017c21a 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/spi/ti_qspi.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/spi/ti_qspi.c
>>>> @@ -170,6 +170,8 @@ void spi_cs_deactivate(struct spi_slave *slave)
>>>>         debug("spi_cs_deactivate: 0x%08x\n", (u32)slave);
>>>>
>>>>         writel(qslave->cmd | QSPI_INVAL, &qslave->base->cmd);
>>>> +       /* dummy readl to ensure bus sync */
>>>> +       readl(&qslave->base->cmd);
>>>
>>> Isn't effect anything for non-quad case? and dummy bytes might changed
>>> based on quad and quadio does this single dummy readl is same for
>>> those cases as well?
>>
>> No, this dummy readl is not related as dummy bytes used in QUAD mode.
>>
>> In ti_qspi controller, in order to end a read/write request (ie to
>> deassert ChipSelect) invalid cmd(0x4) needs to be written to CMD field
>> of QSPI_CMD_REG (which is done by above function) in all modes.
>> Sometimes, this write may have been flushed out of ARM but may not have
>> reached the QSPI IP yet (ie bus/interconnect is not flushed yet) hence
>> ChipSelect is not deactivated. Therefore, the successive write/read
>> operation may overlaps resulting in wrong data being read from flash.
>> Reading back QSPI_CMD_REG makes sure that the bus/interconnect is
>> flushed and register write is affected making sure CS is deactivated.
>
> Thanks for the info.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jagan Teki <jt...@openedev.com>

Applied to u-boot-spi/master

thanks!
-- 
Jagan | openedev.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to