On Monday, November 23, 2015 at 01:25:39 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > +union dramaddrw_reg { > > + struct { > > + u32 cfg_col_addr_width:5; > > + u32 cfg_row_addr_width:5; > > + u32 cfg_bank_addr_width:4; > > + u32 cfg_bank_group_addr_width:2; > > + u32 cfg_cs_addr_width:3; > > + u32 reserved:13; > > + }; > > + u32 word; > > +}; > > Umm. Are you sure this is good idea? Is gcc allowed to do something > funny and reorder bitfields in unexpected way?
GCC won't do anything, but I cannot say I'm a big fan of those bitfields. Let's just drop them and use the BIT() macro. Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot