On 11 December 2015 at 02:57, Troy Kisky <troy.ki...@boundarydevices.com> wrote:
> If GENMASK is REALLY desired, it should be GENMASK(23,0)
> But since GENMASK is obviously more confusing, let's just revert.
>
> This reverts commit bad490a24212c068c5b718b9189f47ea4075d078.

Sorry, just fix genmask why revert? because driver author has no
complaint on this, please don't just say simply "more confusing" more
over I usually prefer reverting bug fix patches.

>
> Reviewed-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.este...@freescale.com>
> Signed-off-by: Troy Kisky <troy.ki...@boundarydevices.com>
>
> ---
> v2: add sign off/ reviewed by
> ---
>  drivers/spi/fsl_qspi.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/fsl_qspi.c b/drivers/spi/fsl_qspi.c
> index ed39114..dd7048a 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/fsl_qspi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/fsl_qspi.c
> @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR;
>  #define TX_BUFFER_SIZE         0x40
>  #endif
>
> -#define OFFSET_BITS_MASK       GENMASK(24, 0)
> +#define OFFSET_BITS_MASK       0x00ffffff
>
>  #define FLASH_STATUS_WEL       0x02
>
> --
> 2.5.0

thanks!
-- 
Jagan.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to