On 10 December 2015 at 23:03, Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All FSP spec v1.0 complaint FSP binary uses struct fspinit_rtbuf
> as defined by the 1.0 spec, however there are FSPs that does not
> follow 1.0 spec (possible due to that FSP predates the 1.0 spec),
> and future FSP binary that is complaint to v1.1 spec defines an
> optional paltform-specific runtime data in the struct fspinit_rtbuf.
> Hence move the definition to chipset header.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bmeng...@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
> ---
>
> Changes in v2: None
>
>  arch/x86/include/asm/arch-baytrail/fsp/fsp_configs.h  |  4 ++++
>  arch/x86/include/asm/arch-queensbay/fsp/fsp_configs.h |  4 ++++
>  arch/x86/include/asm/fsp/fsp_platform.h               | 15 ---------------
>  arch/x86/include/asm/fsp/fsp_support.h                |  1 -
>  4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/fsp/fsp_platform.h

Tested on Minnowmax:
Tested-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org>
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to