On Wednesday, January 13, 2016 at 03:05:40 AM, Chin Liang See wrote: > On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 03:48 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > > On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 01:50:18 AM, Chin Liang See wrote: > > > On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 01:31 +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 01:26:58 AM, Chin Liang See > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 2016-01-11 at 15:33 -0800, Dalon Westergreen wrote: > > > [...] > > > > > > > btw. Completely off-topic, but is there any chance altera will > > > > release the > > > > algorithm to compute these magic values which are in the header > > > > files > > > > from > > > > the base values inserted into the HPS component in QSys ? > > > > > > I would not suggesting that as Qsys and Quartus are doing > > > heavylifting > > > tasks there. The value would depends on the options being choosed, > > > device type, device revision (if any). They also being patched from > > > time to time too. > > > > Is it all really _that_ complicated ? That's why I'd like to see the > > code > > that's doing all that computation. > > Actually more challenges is that the code is proprietary. We might get > stopped by legal team before making this happen too.
What's proprietary about it ? Isn't that SDRAM controller made in-house by Altera ? > > Even if it's done at compile-time, it'd > > still be better than the horrible headers which we have to use now. > > I believe DTS would be better format than header file. Coming up with sensible bindings would be hard though. Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot