On Aug 18, 2009, at 9:14 AM, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Aug 18, 2009, at 5:12 AM, Thirumalai wrote: > >> Hi kumar, >> The CONFIG_PHYS_64BIT was not defined on the header file >> of HPCN but extended address translation was enabled on the start.S >> irrespective of the MPC8641D_hpcn compilation option why?. >> >> Regards, >> T. > > Are you running into an issue with this? It could be to allow an OS > to have 36-bit addressing w/o u-boot having to deal with it.
That's always been there (since the original board port), and it shouldn't cause a problem (or any performance issues), AFAIK. Cheers, Becky _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot