On 02/01/2016 07:42 PM, Bin Meng wrote: <snip>
Bin, > We should add device tree to these platforms. The non-device tree > (U_BOOT_DEVICES) was mainly for some SPL boards which does not have > enough RAM before memory is initialized. I think you may refer to this > patch: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/561853/ I looked into ls1021atwr earlier, ns16550 driver takes default value CONFIG_SYS_NS16550_CLK when the device tree doesn't have the clock-frequency node. It is a smart solution for device-tree enabled platforms. Even I believe we want to go with device tree for new boards, I don't believe driver model has to be used with device tree. We have many boards with sd/spi/nand boot options, including the P2020DS I am trying to bring back. York _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
