Hi, On 3 February 2016 at 08:53, Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> wrote: > > >> Am 03.02.2016 um 12:36 schrieb Leif Lindholm <leif.lindh...@linaro.org>: >> >>> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 03:45:12AM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: >>> UEFI defines a simple boot protocol for removable media. There we should >>> look >>> at the EFI (first GPT FAT) partition and search for /efi/boot/bootXXX.efi >>> with >>> XXX being different between different platforms (x86, x64, arm, aa64, ...). >>> >>> This patch implements a simple version of that protocol for the default >>> distro >>> boot script. With this we can automatically boot from valid UEFI enabled >>> removable media. >>> >>> Because from all I could see U-Boot by default doesn't deliver device tree >>> blobs with its firmware, we also need to load the dtb from somewhere. >>> Traverse >>> the same EFI partition for an fdt file that fits our current board so that >>> an OS receives a valid device tree when booted automatically. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> >>> Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> >>> --- >>> include/config_distro_bootcmd.h | 47 >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >>> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/include/config_distro_bootcmd.h >>> b/include/config_distro_bootcmd.h >>> index 37c6b43..c19f1b0 100644 >>> --- a/include/config_distro_bootcmd.h >>> +++ b/include/config_distro_bootcmd.h >>> @@ -90,6 +90,48 @@ >>> BOOT_TARGET_DEVICES_references_UBIFS_without_CONFIG_CMD_UBIFS >>> #endif >>> >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_EFI_LOADER >>> +#if defined(CONFIG_ARM64) >>> +#define BOOTEFI_NAME "bootaa64.efi" >>> +#elif defined(CONFIG_ARM) >>> +#define BOOTEFI_NAME "bootarm.efi" >>> +#endif >>> +#endif >> >> Actually, since Simon is testing this series also on Minnowboard >> (at least MAX), maybe add bootx64.efi and/or bootia32.efi as well? > > We need more to support a new architecture - relocations for pe and u-boot > for example. So adding the bootia32.efi bits in an x86 enable patch set makes > the most sense imho.
Yes, let's worry about that later. > > >> >> I presume U-Boot for ia64 is not a thing? ;) > > s/U-Boot for // :). Don't ride dead horses. > > > Alex > Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
