On 08.02.2016 15:11, Matthias Weißer wrote:
Hi Hannes
I had the same problem. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/579391/ fixed it.
Regards,
Matthias
2016-02-08 15:01 GMT+01:00 Hannes Schmelzer <han...@schmelzer.or.at>:
On 18.12.2015 06:17, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
Currently, this function returns wrong size if "bootm_low" is defined,
but "bootm_size" is not.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com>
---
common/image.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/common/image.c b/common/image.c
index d63d9e0..f4a1dc8 100644
--- a/common/image.c
+++ b/common/image.c
@@ -472,9 +472,9 @@ phys_size_t getenv_bootm_size(void)
#if defined(CONFIG_ARM) && defined(CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS)
- return gd->bd->bi_dram[0].size - tmp;
+ return gd->bd->bi_dram[0].size - (tmp - gd->bd->bi_dram[0].start);
#else
- return gd->bd->bi_memsize - tmp;
+ return gd->bd->bi_memsize - (tmp - gd->bd->bi_memstart);
#endif
}
Hi Masahiro,
your commit has been merged on 19.1. this year.
Today i ran a test on my tseries board with most current u-boot/master.
I ran into trouble booting my linux kernel:
---
Kernel image @ 0x80200000 [ 0x000000 - 0x222720 ]
## Loading init Ramdisk from Legacy Image at 80a00000 ...
Image Name:
Image Type: ARM Linux RAMDisk Image (uncompressed)
Data Size: 12452646 Bytes = 11.9 MiB
Load Address: 00000000
Entry Point: 00000000
## Flattened Device Tree blob at 80100000
Booting using the fdt blob at 0x80100000
ERROR: Failed to allocate 0xbe0326 bytes below 0x10000000.
ramdisk - allocation error
FDT creation failed! hanging...### ERROR ### Please RESET the board ###
---
I debugged bit am came to the conclusio, that the line
+ return gd->bd->bi_dram[0].size - (tmp - gd->bd->bi_dram[0].start);
brings me into trouble.
On my board DRAM is configured as follows:
U-Boot (BuR V2.0)# bdinfo
arch_number = 0xFFFFFFFF
boot_params = 0x80000100
DRAM bank = 0x00000000
*-> start = 0x80000000**
**-> size = 0x10000000**
*
so size minus start would give a negative number.
I tried local revert of this commit and everything works as before.
more correct would be
+ return gd->bd->bi_dram[0].start - (tmp - gd->bd->bi_dram[0].size);
whats your thinking about?
best regards,
Hannes
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Hi Matthias,
this also fixes my problem.
many thanks!
best regards,
Hannes
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
