From: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com>
Purely by code inspection, it looks like the parameter order to memalign()
is swapped; its parameters are (align, size). 4096 is a likely desired
alignment, and a variable named size sounds like a size:-)
Fixes: 45b5a37836d5 ("x86: Add multi-processor init")
Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com>
---
I've taken a quick look at all the other memalign() calls in U-Boot, and
I /think/ they're all correct.
---
arch/x86/cpu/mp_init.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/cpu/mp_init.c b/arch/x86/cpu/mp_init.c
index 7917350bff26..fc2fb5bf445c 100644
--- a/arch/x86/cpu/mp_init.c
+++ b/arch/x86/cpu/mp_init.c
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ static int load_sipi_vector(atomic_t **ap_countp, int
num_cpus)
params->stack_size = CONFIG_AP_STACK_SIZE;
size = params->stack_size * num_cpus;
- stack = memalign(size, 4096);
+ stack = memalign(4096, size);
if (!stack)
return -ENOMEM;
params->stack_top = (u32)(stack + size);
--
2.7.0
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
