Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Graeme Russ, > > In message <4a927e3b.8040...@gmail.com> you wrote: >>> Are you absolutely sure this is a good idea? >> Hmm, maybe now that it's working I may not need it. I just stg pop'd >> it and the following patches applied cleanly (although it did need to >> auto modify patch 16) and the board still works so I guess I can ditch >> it - Shortens patch series by one - How would you like the resend (maybe >> same length series with Patch 15 being blank?) > > I don;t use that code, and don;t even know which debug options you > have on x86. So it's your decision in the end.
OK, I will ditch - I'll resend a blank 15 and new 16 & 17 tomorrow - It's getting late > >> Arghh, only looked at sc520.h - I just did a global search for space >> followed by tab - 1000+ hits, but i386 and eNET are clean :) > > So you have 1000+ fixes to do? Thanks in advance. LOL - Maybe I'll take that challenge one day > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
