Hi Stephen, On 19 April 2016 at 14:59, Stephen Warren <swar...@wwwdotorg.org> wrote: > From: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com> > > U-Boot is compiled for a single board, which in turn uses a specific SoC. > There's no need to make runtime decisions based on SoC ID. While there's > certainly an argument for making the code support different SoCs at > run-time, the Tegra code is so far from that possible ideal that the > existing runtime code is an anomaly. If this changes in the future, all > runtime decisions should likely be based on DT anyway. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swar...@nvidia.com> > --- > arch/arm/mach-tegra/ap.c | 106 > ++++++++++----------------------- > arch/arm/mach-tegra/cache.c | 20 +++---- > arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpu.c | 16 ++--- > arch/arm/mach-tegra/cpu.h | 6 -- > arch/arm/mach-tegra/tegra20/warmboot.c | 20 ++----- > 5 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 117 deletions(-)
What exactly is missing to prevent multi-arch support? Shouldn't we head towards that rather than making it harder? Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
