On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 05:07:28PM +0100, Leif Lindholm wrote: > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 10:54:23AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 07:10:52PM +0200, Alexander Graf wrote: > > > > > We have a bunch of boards that define their vendor class identifier and > > > client archs in the board files or in the distro config. Move everything > > > to the generic Kconfig options. > > > > This part is good and fine, thanks. Can you please do a follow-up to > > convert CONFIG_SPL_NET_VCI_STRING as well? > > > > > We're missing the distinction between i386 and x86_64, as I couldn't find > > > any config variable that would tell us the difference. Is that really > > > important > > > to people? I guess not, so I left it out. > > > > This part however is is from the RFC (and ARM isn't in it, so 0x100 is > > special magic). See https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4578 section 2.1. I > > suppose reading that now, the right value to use here for your use case > > actually makes what we're doing now a little harder as "Intel x86PC" is > > 0x0, and "EFI IA32" is 0x6. Or we could, if I'm reading the RFC right, > > just drop this part of the code entirely. > > As far as I can tell (and referenced from EDK2 codebase), the > canonical list is > http://www.ietf.org/assignments/dhcpv6-parameters/dhcpv6-parameters.xml#processor-architecture
That's even better, thanks! -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
