Dear Peter, In message <1252426573.6005.253.ca...@localhost.localdomain> you wrote: > > Going over the emails and my own testing, it looks the following > versions worked: ...
Thanks for the detailed analysis. I remember that gcc-3.4.x has always been marked as "suspicious" in our tests, so for example we avoided basing an ELDK release on it. > Does anyone out there by chance have a failure case for gcc > 4.0.0, > because I can't seem to reproduce the issues others had in the past. Do you have an up-to-date patch that can be used for such testing? > My vote would be to find out which version of gcc contains the > relocation bug and spit out an error if gcc < than that version is used. Agreed. > We could also try and get fancy and dynamically turn on/off relocation > support at compile time based on gcc's version if other's wanted to > maintain support for older compilers. These changes would only be for > ppc at this point btw. I think there would be not much lost if we dropped support for versions before gcc-4.x Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de A Perl script is correct if it's halfway readable and gets the job done before your boss fires you. - L. Wall & R. L. Schwartz, _Programming Perl_ _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot