On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 1:25 AM, York Sun <york....@nxp.com> wrote:
> On 05/19/2016 01:23 AM, Hongbo Zhang wrote:
>> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 18/05/16 10:10, macro.wav...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> From: Hongbo Zhang <hongbo.zh...@nxp.com>
>>>>
>
> <snip>
>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> static int fdt_psci(void *fdt)
>>>> {
>>>> #ifdef CONFIG_ARMV7_PSCI
>>>> @@ -67,22 +96,16 @@ static int fdt_psci(void *fdt)
>>>> return nodeoff;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> - tmp = fdt_setprop_string(fdt, nodeoff, "compatible", "arm,psci");
>>>> - if (tmp)
>>>> - return tmp;
>>>> tmp = fdt_setprop_string(fdt, nodeoff, "method", "smc");
>>>> if (tmp)
>>>> return tmp;
>>>> - tmp = fdt_setprop_u32(fdt, nodeoff, "cpu_suspend",
>>>> PSCI_FN_CPU_SUSPEND);
>>>> - if (tmp)
>>>> - return tmp;
>>>> - tmp = fdt_setprop_u32(fdt, nodeoff, "cpu_off", PSCI_FN_CPU_OFF);
>>>> - if (tmp)
>>>> - return tmp;
>>>> - tmp = fdt_setprop_u32(fdt, nodeoff, "cpu_on", PSCI_FN_CPU_ON);
>>>
>>> We keep those function ID specifiers in the node for compatibility
>>> reasons. For PSCI 0.2 and higher they are ignored, but older OSes can
>>> just use them as before.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, good suggestion, thanks.
>
> Hongbo,
>
> I see you are in agreement. Are you going to respin this patch, or keep it as
> is?
>
> York
Hi York,
I'll resend a new version soon, thanks.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
