Hi,
On 13-06-16 12:58, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 5:49 PM, Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com> wrote:
Hi,
On 13-06-16 04:50, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 9:40 PM, Hans de Goede <hdego...@redhat.com>
wrote:
Hi,
On 07-06-16 04:54, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
To make the PSCI backend more maintainable and easier to port to newer
SoCs, rewrite the current PSCI implementation in C.
Some inline assembly bits are required to access coprocessor registers.
PSCI stack setup is the only part left completely in assembly. In theory
this part could be split out of psci_arch_init into a separate common
function, and psci_arch_init could be completely in C.
Signed-off-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <w...@csie.org>
I tried merging this in my tree to add it to u-boot-sunxi/next, but
unfortunately it triggers a bug in gcc-6.1, I've filed a bug with
gcc to get this fixed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344717
Interesting. Seems like the compiler should be emitting LDMFD instead
of POP, or a POP followed by a SUBS/MOVS.
Also cp15_read_scr / cp15_write_scr are missing __secure notations.
Do you want me to send a new version for this?
No, I already have a local branch with this fixed.
As for getting this merged and Tom's "go for it"
comment earlier, I consider this a blocker for merging, sorry.
I hope that the gcc folks can resolve this soon and that I can
get the Fedora devs to deploy a fix soon-ish. I'm not sure what
other distros are doing wrt jumping to gcc-6.1, but having code
in u-boot master which does not build with the latest gcc seems
like a bad idea.
This is marked as resolved upstream:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70830
And Debian/Ubuntu seems to have pulled the fix into their latest
unstable package:
http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/g/gcc-6/gcc-6_6.1.1-6_changelog
I'm not familiar with Fedora, though you could reference the GCC
PR I listed above and have them pull in the fix.
Yes it indeed is that bug, thanks for finding that. I've done a local
Fedora cross-gcc build with the patches from that bug applied and that
fixes things.
I've added these patches to my sunxi-wip branch now and I'll send
them out in my next pull-req, after the dust surrounding the
BOOTDELAY changes settles.
Interesting that Fedora only provides one version of GCC though.
Fedora always contains the latest gcc, glibc, etc. Given that it is
Red Hat's community distro and that we employ a lot of gcc / glibc
developers we try to follow upstream as close as possible.
Regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
