On 14 July 2016 at 00:00, Moritz Fischer <moritz.fisc...@ettus.com> wrote: > Signed-off-by: Moritz Fischer <moritz.fisc...@ettus.com> > --- > drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c > index 4f37e33..8ae4eea 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi/sf_params.c > @@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ const struct spi_flash_params spi_flash_params_table[] = { > {"M25P64", 0x202017, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 128, RD_NORM, > 0}, > {"M25P128", 0x202018, 0x0, 256 * 1024, 64, RD_NORM, > 0}, > {"M25PX64", 0x207117, 0x0, 64 * 1024, 128, RD_NORM, > SECT_4K}, > + {"N25Q016A", 0x20bb15, 0x1000, 64 * 1024, 32, RD_NORM, > SECT_4K},
Why would we need this ext_id (0x1000) here? I understand this is true number for this part but it shouldn't require for probe or require somewhere else? thanks! -- Jagan. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot