On 07/20/2016 06:05 PM, York Sun wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: york sun > Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2016 6:05 AM > To: Qiang Zhao <qiang.z...@nxp.com> > Cc: Xiaobo Xie <xiaobo....@nxp.com>; u-boot@lists.denx.de; Roy Zang > <roy.z...@nxp.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "T2080QDS/PCIe: Soft Reset PCIe on T2080QDS for > down-training issue" > > On 04/20/2016 06:12 PM, York Sun wrote: > > +Roy to comment on iNIC. > > > > On 04/20/2016 06:05 PM, Qiang Zhao wrote: > >> On 04/21/2016 12:58 AM, York Sun wrote: > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: York Sun [mailto:york....@nxp.com] > >>> Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 12:58 AM > >>> To: Qiang Zhao <qiang.z...@nxp.com> > >>> Cc: Xiaobo Xie <xiaobo....@nxp.com>; u-boot@lists.denx.de > >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "T2080QDS/PCIe: Soft Reset PCIe on > >>> T2080QDS for down-training issue" > >>> > >>> On 04/11/2016 02:02 AM, Zhao Qiang wrote: > >>>> This reverts commit 5066e62847bddf6030262ade2aa3e7bcdc930037. > >>>> > >>>> The reverted patch will block t2080RDB iNiC, it was a workaround > >>>> for T2080QDS down-training issue, we need to revert it and find the > >>>> root cause for T2080QDS down-training issue. > >>> > >>> You have a bad wrap-back in commit message. > >>> > >>> Does the workaround block anything? Can you revert it after figuring > >>> out the root cause? > >>> > >> > >> Yes, it blocks t2080RDB and c29x when using them as iNIC. > >> If revert it after figuring out the root cause, how about iNIC? > >> And I am afraid of it is a hard way to find the root cause. > >> > > > > Qiang, > > > > You delete the code gated by CONFIG_FSL_PCIE_RESET, and the macro for > T208xQDS. > > How does that affect T2080RDB or C29x? > > > > Qiang, > > Do you have an update? If not, I will defer this patch. >
There is no any update. -Zhao Qiang _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot