Hi Stefan,

Am 2016-08-14 03:50, schrieb Stefan Bruens:
On Freitag, 12. August 2016 15:16:20 CEST Michael Walle wrote:
All fields were accessed directly instead of using the proper byte swap
functions. Thus, ext4 write support was only usable on little-endian
architectures. Fix this.

Signed-off-by: Michael Walle <mich...@walle.cc>

I have tested this on sandbox (x86_64), no regressions found. Some remarks
below.

Reviewed-by: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bru...@rwth-aachen.de>
Tested-by: Stefan Brüns <stefan.bru...@rwth-aachen.de>


[snip]

@@ -2234,7 +2246,7 @@ int ext4fs_mount(unsigned part_length)
         * and we do not support metadata_csum (and cannot reliably find
         * files when it is set.  Refuse to mount.
         */
-       if (data->sblock.feature_incompat & EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_64BIT) {
+       if (le32_to_cpu(data->sblock.feature_incompat) &
EXT4_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_64BIT) { printf("Unsupported feature found (64bit,
possibly metadata_csum), not mounting\n"); goto fail;
        }

This should have a if ((data->sblock.revision_level !=0) && ... in front, features are not defined for revision 0. Applies to other places as well ...


are you sure about that? I can't find any code in the kernel where features are only valid if revision > 0. Also, I couldn't find anything in the ext4 documentation wiki:

https://ext4.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Ext4_Disk_Layout

-michael
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to