On 08/22/2016 09:43 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:18:22PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > >> Prior to this commit, the tool could not move options guarded by >> CONFIG_SPL_BUILD ifdef conditionals because they do not show up in >> include/autoconf.mk. This new option, if given, makes the tool >> parse spl/include/autoconf.mk instead of include/autoconf.mk, >> which is probably preferred behavior when moving options for SPL. >> >> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masah...@socionext.com> > > Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> >
I think we are still missing the case of some option being defined one way in the SPL build case but another the regular case, which one should be added to the defconfig? In a set of slides[0] I found on the subject it looks like there was going to be a system where we could conditionally define options in defconfig based on whether we were building SPL or not. So we could run moveconfig in multiple passes and find what kind of tag we need. S:CONFIG_FOO=200 T:CONFIG_FOO=300 ST:CONFIG_BAR=y +S:CONFIG_BAZ=y +T:CONFIG_QUX=y +ST:CONFIG_QUUX=y etc.. Did this ever get implemented? [0] http://www.denx.de/wiki/pub/U-Boot/MiniSummitELCE2014/uboot2014_kconfig.pdf _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
