On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Ziyuan Xu <xzy...@rock-chips.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > > On 2016年08月28日 03:39, Sandy Patterson wrote: > >> Rock2 has been tested with back to brom feature. The tricky part is that >> with this feature the default environment is inside u-boot, and it's >> defined for every rk3288 board independetly. So I just changed it for >> rock2 here. >> >> Solve by moving environment after u-boot before 1M boundary >> >> Signed-off-by: Sandy Patterson <apatter...@sightlogix.com> >> --- >> > > According to your change, I think your commit message is not match. > Enable ROCKCHIP_SPL_BACK_TO_BROM for rock2 board??? Oops. It looks like my change to the rock2_defconfig ended up in the other patch. I'll resubmit with the defconfig in this patch. > > > >> Changes in v2: None >> >> include/configs/rock2.h | 8 ++++---- >> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/include/configs/rock2.h b/include/configs/rock2.h >> index ee924c3..946367f 100644 >> --- a/include/configs/rock2.h >> +++ b/include/configs/rock2.h >> @@ -16,11 +16,11 @@ >> #define CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_MMC >> #define CONFIG_SYS_MMC_ENV_DEV 0 >> -/* SPL @ 32k for ~36k >> - * ENV @ 96k >> - * u-boot @ 128K >> +/* SPL @ 32k for 34k >> + * u-boot directly after @ 68k for 400k or so >> + * ENV @ 992k >> */ >> -#define CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET (96 * 1024) >> +#define CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET ((1024-32) * 1024) >> #define CONFIG_SYS_WHITE_ON_BLACK >> #define CONFIG_CONSOLE_SCROLL_LINES 10 >> > > > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
