On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 12:44:17AM +0200, Ladislav Michl wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 08:52:21AM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 11:07:57AM +0200, Ladislav Michl wrote: > > > Update defconfigs and drop NAND specific defconfig as flash type > > > is runtime detected. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl <la...@linux-mips.org> > > > --- > > > configs/igep0030_defconfig | 5 ++++- > > > configs/igep0030_nand_defconfig | 30 ------------------------------ > > > configs/igep0032_defconfig | 4 +++- > > > 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) > > > delete mode 100644 configs/igep0030_nand_defconfig > > > > > > diff --git a/configs/igep0030_defconfig b/configs/igep0030_defconfig > > > index 66371d6..eb7a28f 100644 > > > --- a/configs/igep0030_defconfig > > > +++ b/configs/igep0030_defconfig > > > @@ -2,7 +2,9 @@ CONFIG_ARM=y > > > CONFIG_OMAP34XX=y > > > # CONFIG_SPL_EXT_SUPPORT is not set > > > CONFIG_TARGET_OMAP3_IGEP00X0=y > > > -CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS="MACH_TYPE=MACH_TYPE_IGEP0030,BOOT_ONENAND" > > > +CONFIG_SPL=y > > > +CONFIG_SYS_EXTRA_OPTIONS="MACH_TYPE=MACH_TYPE_IGEP0020" > > > > Since you're even changing MACH_TYPE here, do we really need to be > > setting this? For both defconfigs, even. Thanks! > > Gah... I have to screw it up while resolving conflicts with upstream changes. > Obviously MACH_TYPE has to remain the same. Will do v2. I'm sorry for that.
But why do we even need to set MACH_TYPE these days? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot