On 09/30/2016 05:44 AM, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
On Wed, 2016-09-28 at 12:11 -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 09/28/2016 03:35 AM, Marcel Ziswiler wrote:
Now with the config block handling in place move the U-Boot
environment
location before the config block at the end of 1st "boot sector" as
deployed during production using our downstream BSP.
diff --git a/include/configs/apalis_t30.h b/include/configs/apalis_t30.h
-/* Environment in eMMC, at the end of 2nd "boot sector" */
+/* Environment in eMMC, before config block at the end of 1st "boot sector" */
#define CONFIG_ENV_IS_IN_MMC
-#define CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET (-CONFIG_ENV_SIZE)
+#define CONFIG_ENV_OFFSET (-CONFIG_ENV_SIZE + \
+ CONFIG_TDX_CFG_BLOCK_OFFSET)
I'm not convinced that ENV_OFFSET actually points where the description
says it does. (-CONFIG_ENV_SIZE + CONFIG_TDX_CFG_BLOCK_OFFSET) is (-8192
+ -512). The original comment states that an ENV_OFFSET of -8192 locates
the environment at the end of a sector, so shifting it 512 bytes earlier
in the flash can't possible now align it with a different sector?
Why not?
If -8192 is aligned to the last sector boundary, the sectors must be
8192 bytes in size (or the last sector isn't a whole sector, which is
highly unlikely). If so, then 512 bytes away from that isn't also at a
sector boundary.
Should ENV_OFFSET be shifted down by a whole sector size by this patch, i.e.
should
+CONFIG_TXT_CFG_BLOCK_OFFSET be rounded up to a sector size to match the
comment?
Yes, a block, sector or whatever you wana call it is actually 512 bytes
in size on all eMMCs or even MMC/SD cards that I have seen so far.
I guess while it would be kind of nice having this enforced to some
intrinsic size in software ultimately this is a board configuration
option concerning our Toradex factory configuration block as programmed
during production. We just want to make sure that one is preserved and
the environment is stored right before.
Ah, I see. the existing comment uses the term "sector" incorrectly,
which is where the confusion arises. eMMC do indeed have 512-byte
sectors. I suppose the old (and new) comments should refer to HW boot
partitions, not "sectors"?
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
