When 2 commands are submitted in a row, and the second is very quick,
the completion of the second command might never come. This happens
especially if the second command is quick, such as a status read
after an erase
Cc: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarz...@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Chris Packham <judge.pack...@gmail.com>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
index 3c065169ce9c..9a43bd11a453 100644
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
@@ -619,8 +619,14 @@ static irqreturn_t pxa3xx_nand_irq(struct pxa3xx_nand_info
*info)
is_ready = 1;
}
+ /*
+ * Clear all status bit before issuing the next command, which
+ * can and will alter the status bits and will deserve a new
+ * interrupt on its own. This lets the controller exit the IRQ
+ */
+ nand_writel(info, NDSR, status);
+
if (status & NDSR_WRCMDREQ) {
- nand_writel(info, NDSR, NDSR_WRCMDREQ);
status &= ~NDSR_WRCMDREQ;
info->state = STATE_CMD_HANDLE;
@@ -641,8 +647,6 @@ static irqreturn_t pxa3xx_nand_irq(struct pxa3xx_nand_info
*info)
nand_writel(info, NDCB0, info->ndcb3);
}
- /* clear NDSR to let the controller exit the IRQ */
- nand_writel(info, NDSR, status);
if (is_completed)
info->cmd_complete = 1;
if (is_ready)
--
2.10.0.479.g7c56b16
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
