On 10/27/2016 05:33 AM, york sun wrote: > On 10/21/2016 04:37 PM, york sun wrote: >> On 10/18/2016 07:48 PM, Hamish Martin wrote: >>> This erratum is already implemented for other ARM based QorIQ >>> platforms with the Gen4 DDR controller. Port the fix to the Gen3 >>> controller and enable it for T2080 and T2081. >>> >>> Reviewed-by: Chris Packham <chris.pack...@alliedtelesis.co.nz> >>> Signed-off-by: Hamish Martin <hamish.mar...@alliedtelesis.co.nz> >>> Cc: York Sun <york....@nxp.com> >>> --- >>> arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cmd_errata.c | 3 +++ >>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/config_mpc85xx.h | 1 + >>> drivers/ddr/fsl/mpc85xx_ddr_gen3.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++ >>> 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cmd_errata.c >>> b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cmd_errata.c >>> index 3b06ae42e4bc..94b6dcca96b6 100644 >>> --- a/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cmd_errata.c >>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/cpu/mpc85xx/cmd_errata.c >>> @@ -329,6 +329,9 @@ static int do_errata(cmd_tbl_t *cmdtp, int flag, int >>> argc, char * const argv[]) >>> #ifdef CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A009663 >>> puts("Work-around for Erratum A009663 enabled\n"); >>> #endif >>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A009942 >>> + puts("Work-around for Erratum A009942 enabled\n"); >>> +#endif >>> >>> return 0; >>> } >>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/config_mpc85xx.h >>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/config_mpc85xx.h >>> index 6d845e859f4a..9e1cd80e16e0 100644 >>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/config_mpc85xx.h >>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/config_mpc85xx.h >>> @@ -910,6 +910,7 @@ defined(CONFIG_PPC_T1014) || defined(CONFIG_PPC_T1013) >>> #define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A006593 >>> #define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A007186 >>> #define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A006379 >>> +#define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_ERRATUM_A009942 >>> #define ESDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_TIMEOUT_VALUE >>> #define CONFIG_SYS_FSL_SFP_VER_3_0 >>> >> Thanks for fixing it. Please also enable this workaround for T1024, >> T2080, T1040, B4420, B4860, T4240 (and change the subject accordingly). > A second thought, NXP is updating this erratum workaround. A new patch > will be sent out. Thanks for bring it up. > > York Just to clarify, should I abandon this patch because you (or someone else from NXP) will provide a better, more comprehensive fix?
Thanks, Hamish M. _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot