On 10/11/2016 07:11 AM, M.H. Lian wrote: >> >> I got it. But this does not look that good to me. There are two controllers, >> and >> bus number should be relative to the controller itself, not system wide. It's >> definitely right to assign bus number 0 to both PCIe host controllers, as >> they >> forward the bus number on their own bus link. I am wondering we should >> add a controller number to the PCI command, like the storage device >> command. The first parameter is the controller number, while the second >> parameter is the bus number. > [Minghuan Lian] Yes. Linux uses "PCI domain" to isolate PCIe controllers. > And config "CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS" is to enable domain like controllers number. > But, under Linux if disable "CONFIG_PCI_DOMAINS ", all PCIe controllers will > be assigned continuous bus > Number like the current uboot. >
Where are we on this set? York _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
