Hi Andre, On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 02:57:05PM +0000, Andre Przywara wrote: > The ENABLE_ARM_SOC_BOOT0_HOOK option is a generic option shared with > other boards. To allow alternative code to be inserted, we create > another, now function specific config symbol on top of it to simplify > later additions. No functional change at this time. > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przyw...@arm.com> > --- > board/sunxi/Kconfig | 9 +++++++++ > configs/pine64_plus_defconfig | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/board/sunxi/Kconfig b/board/sunxi/Kconfig > index e1d4ab1..0cd57a2 100644 > --- a/board/sunxi/Kconfig > +++ b/board/sunxi/Kconfig > @@ -133,6 +133,15 @@ config MACH_SUN8I > bool > default y if MACH_SUN8I_A23 || MACH_SUN8I_A33 || MACH_SUN8I_H3 || > MACH_SUN8I_A83T > > +config RESERVE_ALLWINNER_BOOT0_HEADER > + bool "reserve space for Allwinner boot0 header" > + select ENABLE_ARM_SOC_BOOT0_HOOK > + ---help--- > + Prepend a 1536 byte (empty) header to the U-Boot image file, to be > + filled with magic values post build. The Allwinner provided boot0 > + blob relies on this information to load and execute U-Boot. > + Only needed on 64-bit Allwinner boards so far when using boot0. > +
Is there a reason you can think of to disable it? If not, you should consider making this enabled by default, so that we don't enable it in all the defconfig for no particular reason. Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
