On Monday 21 November 2016 11:33 PM, Jagan Teki wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Vignesh R <vigne...@ti.com> wrote:
>> Hi Jagan,
>>
>> On Thursday 13 October 2016 06:24 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 05:45:52PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Vignesh R <vigne...@ti.com> wrote:
>>>>> Unlike Linux kernel, U-Boot depends on "spi-flash" compatible to probe
>>>>> m25p80 spi-nor devices. Hence, add "spi-flash" compatible string to
>>>>> m25p80 node. Without this patch, flash device DT data is not parsed and
>>>>> QSPI operates in unsupported mode leading to data corruption.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Vignesh R <vigne...@ti.com>
>>>>
>>>> Applied to u-boot-spi/master
>>>
>>> ... I don't like that we need a non u-boot prefixed string here for the
>>> binding to work as that will lead to harder re-syncs later on the dt
>>> files.  Why aren't we matching on the existing part?  Thanks!
>>>
>>
>> I don't see this patch in u-boot master yet. If this patch was dropped
>> due to Tom's comment above, then could you suggest how to address the issue?
> 
> Some how missed this, but do you still unable to probe the flash w/o
> "spi-flash"? I think there is a device_probe when !device_active(dev)
> that will detect the flash chip. Please try once.
> 

Yes, the flash is detected. But the device is not bound due to missing
"spi-flash" compatible and hence DT properties of flash node are not
available to the driver. So, the QSPI controller tries to operate in
mode 0 instead of mode 3 and default frequency instead of 48MHz as
specified by spi-max-frequency property leading to failure of flashing
operations.


-- 
Regards
Vignesh
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to