Abdoulaye Walsimou Gaye wrote: > kevin.morf...@fearnside-systems.co.uk a écrit : >> Here are links to the patches and notes on their states: >> - [U-boot] [PATCH-ARM] CONFIG_SYS_HZ change for cpu/arm920t/s3c24x0 boards: >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-September/thread.html, >> JP said it looked OK but needed testing, then it was tested by Wolfgang >> - [U-Boot] [PATCH-ARM 1/4, v2] Clean-up of cpu/arm920t and >> cpu/arm920t/s3c24x0 code (this patch): one comment so far (your own) >> - [U-Boot] [PATCH-ARM 2/4] Clean-up of s3c24x0 header files: >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-September/060111.html, >> no comments as yet >> - [U-Boot] [PATCH-ARM 3/4, v2] Clean-up of s3c24x0 drivers excluding nand >> driver, http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-September/061583.html, >> one comment by Gaye Abdoulaye Walsimou, fixed in v2 >> - [U-Boot] [PATCH-ARM 4/4, v2] Clean-up of s3c24x0 nand driver, >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-September/061584.html, >> v1 was Acked by Scott here - >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-September/060580.html >> >> >>> But there are remained more works for cleaning >>> >> My aim is to clean up just the s3c24x0 common code so I can later add >> support >> for the Embest SBC2440-II Board. I can see that the rest of the arm920t code >> also needs cleaning but this would be a much bigger job and could be done >> later - I'd rather limit these patches to s3c24x0 code. >> >> >>> please use lower case name at C structure's members and functions >>> >> I think I have changed all structure names to lower case in the s3c24x0 code. >> I also think I've changed all function names to lower case except where >> the change would affect too many other areas - for example, if I change >> get_HCLK() to get_hclk() in cpu/arm920t/s3c24x0/speed.c I'd also need to >> change the same in include/common.h, cpu/lh7a40x, arm920t/imx and >> arm1176/s3c64xx and all functions that call get_HCLK() throughout u-boot. >> Again, this does need doing but could be done later. >> > Kevin, > As nobody seems to have an objection about your changes, I think you can > just go ahead and make available > changes to support s3c2440 and your board. > I've missed the merge window for this u-boot release so I may as well submit the s3c2440 and sbc2440-ii board patches after this release.
So far only 1 of the 5 existing patches has been Ack-ed and 1 tested so I need to get them all accepted by the Samsung ARM custodian for this release. > Cheers, > > > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot