On Sat, Jan 14, 2017 at 02:38:02PM +0100, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 22:08:03 -0700 > Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > > > Hi Emmanuel, > > > > On 28 December 2016 at 03:57, Emmanuel Vadot <m...@bidouilliste.com> wrote: > > > On Wed, 28 Dec 2016 11:30:10 +0100 > > > Emmanuel Vadot <m...@bidouilliste.com> wrote: > > > > > >> > > >> Hello Simon, > > >> > > >> On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 01:39:06 -0700 > > >> Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> wrote: > > >> > > >> > On 18 December 2016 at 19:48, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > >> > > On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 08:16:01PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > >> Move sunxi boards to use binman. This involves adding the image > > >> > >> definition > > >> > >> to the device tree and using it in the Makefile. > > >> > >> > > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > >> > > > > >> > > Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> > > >> > > > > >> > > -- > > >> > > Tom > > >> > > > >> > Applied to u-boot-dm and now in mainline. > > >> > > >> Shouldn't all the config for sunxi board defines > > >> CONFIG_SPL_OF_PLATDATA=y now so libfdt.so will be built ? > > >> > > > > > > Sorry, I meant the python module. > > > > Well for now an easier solution is to build sandbox_spl once. My plan > > is to upstream the Python bindings to libfdt, but it's slow going. > > There should be no major consequence to not having the module. It is > > just fractionally slower. > > > > Regards, > > Simon > > On FreeBSD we don't have fdtget as part as our base system and it's > not available in the ports (well now it is). > For now we simply don't depend on CONFIG_SPL_OF_PLATDATA to compile > the swig bindings as it's faster to compile/use it than using fdtget. > Maybe this patch > https://people.freebsd.org/~manu/uboot/2017.01/0001-build-Always-build-the-libfdt-python-module.patch > make sense to be upstream in u-boot ? > It doesn't take that long to compile the bindings and there is still > the check on the presence of the swig binary.
Yes, I think the FreeBSD patch there should be upstream, it seems reasonable enough for portability. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot