Dear Jens Scharsig, In message <4ae7110b.7030...@bus-elektronik.de> you wrote: > Wolfgang Denk schrieb: > > And by the way: please chose a board name that can be used > > consistently: > > > >> +EB_CPUx9K2_config : unconfig > >> + @$(MKCONFIG) $(@:_config=) arm arm920t EB+CPUx9K2 BuS at91rm9200 > > > > If the target name is EB_CPUx9K2 (why are you shouting here?) then the > > board directory and config file names shall be based on EB_CPUx9K2, too. > > It's a incomplete rename by my side. sorry. > > Wath name/syntax do you prefer? eb_cpux9k2... or eb+cpux9k2...
'+' is not a valid character in any identifier, so please avoid this. Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de It's not an optical illusion, it just looks like one. -- Phil White _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
