Hi Simon,

On 04.05.2017 18:50, Simon Glass wrote:

<snip>

... the current implementation to exit the loop over all children
upon error and not remove the remaining children is wrong IMO. All
devices should at least be tried to get removed, even if one fails
to get removed. This is what this patch makes sure of.


Yes I see that, but not being able to remove is actually an error. In
the normal course of events, a device that will not remove itself is
likely buggy.


Isn't it enough then to just print an error message in this case
in this loop - change debug() to printf() in this current patch
version? Then "users" of this code will be aware of such remove
failures and can take appropriate actions (fix bug etc in their
setup).

Possibly, but programmatically it becomes impossible to detect a
failure. Say the USB fails to stop its DMA, we might want to reboot
rather than continue to boot Linux and crash.

Okay, I see your point.


What do you think about adding a new remove flag to indicate that
failures should be skipped?


I'm a bit afraid that this makes the code overly complex. But if
you prefer to have it this way, then I can come up with such a
version as well. Just let me know.

I don't think the complexity is too great. It does need a new test.
But I think we should hold the line on error checking even with
remove(), by default.

Understood. How about doing it this way: You drop this patch from
the series for now (it still works for us with the force remove of
the serial driver) and apply the remaining patches. I'll try to get
back to this skip-failures flag implementation in a few days / weeks.

Is this okay for you?

Thanks,
Stefan
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to