Hi Ziyuan, On 06/05/2017 09:50 AM, Ziyuan wrote: > hi Jaehoon, > > On 05/25/2017 09:08 PM, Jaehoon Chung wrote: >> Hi Ziyuan, >> >> On 05/25/2017 05:12 PM, Ziyuan wrote: >>> hi Jaehoon, >>> >>> On 05/16/2017 09:55 AM, Jaehoon Chung wrote: >>>> Hi Ziyuan, >>>> >>>> On 05/16/2017 10:15 AM, Ziyuan wrote: >>>>> hi Simon & Jaehoon, >>>>> >>>>> On 05/16/2017 08:18 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >>>>>> Hi Ziyuan, >>>>>> >>>>>> On 15 May 2017 at 00:06, Ziyuan Xu <xzy...@rock-chips.com> wrote: >>>>>>> The original implementation select HS timing by default, add available >>>>>>> type selection for higher speed mode compatibility, such as hs200, >>>>>>> hs400, hs400es. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> By the way, we assume that card run at 1.8V or 1.2V I/O when its timing >>>>>>> is ddr52/hs200/hs400(es). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ziyuan Xu <xzy...@rock-chips.com> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> drivers/mmc/mmc.c | 59 >>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >>>>>>> include/mmc.h | 16 +++++++++++++++ >>>>>>> 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>>>> >>>>>> Is there a cover letter for this series, please? >>>>> This patchset is used for hs200/hs400/ddr52 mode of eMMC device, and >>>>> fixes some bug for dw_mmc & sdhci controller. >>>>> It's only valid in U-Boot stage, we still use 'High Speed' in SPL. >>>>> >>>>> I tested it on evb-rk3288 board(eMMC 4.5) and evb-rk3388 board(eMMC 5.0). >>>>>> I just reviewed an MMC series at add higher speed support. I'm not >>>>>> sure but I suspect these overlap. >>>>> Ha, I just reviewed Vignesh's patches, it focuses on uhs mode of sd card. >>>>> It looks to me. >>>>> But some details are not the same as mine. Anyway, what do you think? >>>> I didn't review both yet..After checking, i will share my opinion. how >>>> about? >>> *ping*... >>> Did you test this patchset on Samsung platform? As far as I know, Samsung >>> SoCs also make use of dw_mmc and sdhci controllers. >> some details are not the same as yours..but some points are duplicated. >> DWMMC and sdhci controller side are not duplicated.. >> >> As i am feeling..your patches are based on Linux kernel code..right? > > Yup, the kernel's mmc driver is stabilized and it was tested on so many > various boards. > Simon had review Jean-jacques's patch, but a little glitch need to be > debugged. So I should wait for him, and rebase?
I will make a branch for testing about HS200 and UHS-I..then you can make the patches based on it. Well, after making branch, i will share it at mailing. Thanks for your effort! Best Regards, Jaehoon Chung > >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Simon >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot