Hi Pawel, On 7 June 2017 at 09:22, Paweł Jarosz <paweljarosz3...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Simon > > > W dniu 06.06.2017 o 23:10, Simon Glass pisze: >> >> Hi Pawel, >> >> On 6 June 2017 at 12:50, Paweł Jarosz <paweljarosz3...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> +#include <dm/test.h> >>> +#include <dm/util.h> >>> +#include <power/regulator.h> >>> +#include <syscon.h> >> >> That should go below spi.h >> > Ok >>> >>> + >>> +DECLARE_GLOBAL_DATA_PTR; >>> + >>> +u32 spl_boot_device(void) >>> +{ >> >> This function seems to be common. Can you please (in a separate patch) >> move it into a separate shared file and delete all the copies? > > Ok >> >> >>> + >>> + sdram_initialise(); >> >> How come TPL is setting up the DRAM? Shouldn't that be done in SPL? >> > Due to size issues i needed to move spl load to sdram (not sram) and sdram > settings > should be done by code executed in SRAM or you get to hang a board.
What is the size limit on SRAM? [...] >>> +config SYS_SOC >>> + default "rockchip" >>> + >>> +config SYS_MALLOC_F_LEN >>> + default 0x0800 >>> + >>> +config SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT >> >> You should be able to add these as 'imply' options now (to the >> ROCKCHIP_RK3066 config) >> > What do you mean by 'imply' options? Things like: config ROCKCHIP_RK3288 bool "Support Rockchip RK3288" select CPU_V7 select SPL_BOARD_INIT if SPL select SUPPORT_SPL select SPL imply SPL_LIBCOMMON_SUPPORT Either select or imply cause that option to be enabled. >>> +#define CONFIG_SPL_FRAMEWORK 1 >>> +#define CONFIG_SPL_CLK 1 >>> +#define CONFIG_SPL_PINCTRL 1 >>> +#define CONFIG_SPL_REGMAP 1 >> >> Many of these should be set in Kconfig or the defconfig file. >> > Yes but some have gave me tpl build issues that's why i did that here We need to figure out if TPL is really needed. E.g. I don't think kylin_rk3036 needs it. It produces an SPL that is about 4KB. Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot