On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:56:04AM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote: > To allow the loading of environment from IDE (for example, using FAT) > the initilization of IDE subsystem must come before the environment > one. > > Successfully tested on QEMU x86. > > Signed-off-by: Otavio Salvador <ota...@ossystems.com.br> > --- > > common/board_r.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/common/board_r.c b/common/board_r.c > index adc1f1937e..247a6668fc 100644 > --- a/common/board_r.c > +++ b/common/board_r.c > @@ -806,6 +806,9 @@ static init_fnc_t init_sequence_r[] = { > #ifdef CONFIG_MMC > initr_mmc, > #endif > +#if defined(CONFIG_IDE) > + initr_ide, > +#endif > #ifdef CONFIG_HAS_DATAFLASH > initr_dataflash, > #endif > @@ -878,9 +881,6 @@ static init_fnc_t init_sequence_r[] = { > #if defined(CONFIG_CMD_PCMCIA) && !defined(CONFIG_IDE) > initr_pcmcia, > #endif > -#if defined(CONFIG_IDE) > - initr_ide, > -#endif > #ifdef CONFIG_LAST_STAGE_INIT > INIT_FUNC_WATCHDOG_RESET > /*
Looking at the gap between these two areas, I see that we would initialize PCI between the two areas. So there's probably boards with PCI IDE devices that'll regress if I take this now. What's the answer? Long term, device model. Short term? Is there a specific upstream platform that you're seeing the problem or, or just custom / out of tree? -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot