Le 22/06/2017 à 09:20, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
Dear Tom,

In message <20170621152200.GJ27196@bill-the-cat> you wrote:

With what I'm going to send out as a v2 of the rest of the series, I'm
OK with not including an empty directory for now and bringing back
mpc8xx, thanks again!

Sorry, but I disagree here.

This revert series is a mess.  It does not simply re-add 8xx
support, it reverts everything and then re-removes everything except
8xx.  This is totally unnecessary and ugly.  Please do not accept
these patches.


Also, as Heiko already mentioned, if we re-add 8xx support, this
should be done in a way that matches today's requirements. The code
needs cleanup everywhere: directory layout, Kconfig, DM support, I/O
accessors, etc.

Yes I have accepted this task, but please don't make it more complicated than it is already. I need to start from an existing situation and go step by step just like it has been done with other targets.

Christophe



NAK!




Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to