Le 22/06/2017 à 09:20, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
Dear Tom,
In message <20170621152200.GJ27196@bill-the-cat> you wrote:
With what I'm going to send out as a v2 of the rest of the series, I'm
OK with not including an empty directory for now and bringing back
mpc8xx, thanks again!
Sorry, but I disagree here.
This revert series is a mess. It does not simply re-add 8xx
support, it reverts everything and then re-removes everything except
8xx. This is totally unnecessary and ugly. Please do not accept
these patches.
Also, as Heiko already mentioned, if we re-add 8xx support, this
should be done in a way that matches today's requirements. The code
needs cleanup everywhere: directory layout, Kconfig, DM support, I/O
accessors, etc.
Yes I have accepted this task, but please don't make it more complicated
than it is already. I need to start from an existing situation and go
step by step just like it has been done with other targets.
Christophe
NAK!
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot