On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:23 AM, lukma <lu...@denx.de> wrote: >> On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 16:31 -0400, Tom Rini wrote: >>> On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 10:48:36PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >>>> On Tue, 2017-04-18 at 16:49 +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote:
>>>> I started looking into this direction and have a question: >>>> what the point to move to that class if it's broken from the >>>> beginning? >>>> >>>> I really do not understand who on the earth would like to have >>>> wdt_stop() at ->probe() (the only two users do exactly that!). > > > At least for TI (omap), please find explanation in the description of this > commit: > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/729819/ No, it doesn't clarify for users of WDT class. It's another story AFAICS. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot