On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 09:36:35PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Max, > > In message <1502572898.17070.11.ca...@gmail.com> you wrote: > > > > Ok, will do. The issue is that linking the standalone application > > to have its text segment at a hardcoded address is less > > likely to work than using an address provided by the board > > This may (or may not) be the case - but no matter how youlook at it, > chosing CONFIG_LOADADDR is definitely the wrong approach, as the > LOAD address has nothing to do with the ENTRY point address, so it > must in no case ever play a role when linking an image. > > > configuration as a possible load address. > > You are confused in your wording, and I'm afraid in your thinking, > too. > > load address != entry point.
But we're talking about CONFIG_STANDALONE_LOAD_ADDR not CONFIG_STANDALONE_ENTRY_POINT. What we've been doing in arch/arm/config.mk has been on my to fix list for a long time, because it's been wrong for so many boards. Setting this to CONFIG_LOADADDR is a reasonable default value. -- Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
