On 09/06/2017 11:01 PM, Lothar Waßmann wrote:
On Wed, 6 Sep 2017 10:34:33 -0700 Eric Nelson wrote:
On 09/05/2017 06:16 PM, Peng Fan wrote:
On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 07:48:56PM -0700, Eric Nelson wrote:
Hi Peng,

Can you tell that I'm hunting a bug in an old version?

I'm seeing a **very** intermittent regression between U-Boot
versions 2015.07 and 2016.05 and happened to spot something
in this patch.

On 04/27/2016 07:07 PM, Peng Fan wrote:
Some toolchains fail to build
"clk->rate = (u64)(clk->parent->rate * 16) / div;"
And the cast usage is wrong.

Use the following code to fix the issue,
"
    do_div(parent_rate, div);
    clk->rate = parent_rate;
"

Reported-by: Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <van.free...@gmail.com>
Cc: Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.este...@nxp.com>
Cc: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>
Cc: Anatolij Gustschin <ag...@denx.de>
Cc: Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com>
Tested-by: Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com>
---

Hi Peter,

   Please help test this patch to see whether this fix your issue or not.
   Thanks for pointing out this issue.

Thanks,
Peng.

   drivers/video/ipu_common.c | 4 +++-
   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/video/ipu_common.c b/drivers/video/ipu_common.c
index 36d4b23..5676a0f 100644
--- a/drivers/video/ipu_common.c
+++ b/drivers/video/ipu_common.c
@@ -352,7 +352,9 @@ static int ipu_pixel_clk_set_rate(struct clk *clk, unsigned 
long rate)
         */
        __raw_writel((div / 16) << 16, DI_BS_CLKGEN1(clk->id));

Did we lose a multiply by 16 in this change?

We already have "parent_rate = (unsigned long long)clk->parent->rate * 16;"
in this function.


Hmmm. So this patch also fixed a bug, since we previously had
**two** multiply-by-16's:

No! The 'second' multiply by 16 used the clk->parent->rate, not the
'parent_rate' which was multiplied by 16...

| parent_rate = (unsigned long long)clk->parent->rate * 16;
[...]
| clk->rate = (u64)(clk->parent->rate * 16) / div;


Doh! I clearly missed that.

Thanks Lothar.
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Reply via email to