Hi, On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 12:40:05AM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > Enable verified-boot support for sunxi a64, tested the > same in orangepi boards. > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <ja...@amarulasolutions.com>
How was it tested? Can you write some documentation for it? > --- > arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig | 2 ++ > include/configs/sunxi-common.h | 2 ++ > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig > index 09cfec6..cf6b264 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/Kconfig > @@ -178,6 +178,8 @@ config MACH_SUN50I > select SUNXI_DRAM_DW > select SUNXI_DRAM_DW_32BIT > select FIT > + select FIT_SIGNATURE I'd rather not select it, given the recent issues with the binary size, and the fact that this has been tested only on one, quite recent, SoC so far. How about an imply? or a default y? > + select FIT_VERBOSE Why do you need this? > select SPL_LOAD_FIT > > config MACH_SUN50I_H5 > diff --git a/include/configs/sunxi-common.h b/include/configs/sunxi-common.h > index 4207398..921eb4f 100644 > --- a/include/configs/sunxi-common.h > +++ b/include/configs/sunxi-common.h > @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ > > #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64 > #define CONFIG_BUILD_TARGET "u-boot.itb" > +/* Extend size of kernel image for uncompression */ > +#define CONFIG_SYS_BOOTM_LEN (60 * 1024 * 1024) I thought the arm64 kernels were uncompressed? That should probably be in a separate patch anyway. Thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering http://free-electrons.com
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot