Hi, On Fri, Dec 25, 2009 at 22:41:13, Dirk Behme wrote: > On 23.12.2009 08:44, Sudhakar Rajashekhara wrote: > > From: Sekhar Nori<nsek...@ti.com> > > > > This adds a driver for the SPI controller found on davinci > > based SoCs from Texas Instruments. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori<nsek...@ti.com> > > Signed-off-by: Sudhakar Rajashekhara<sudhakar....@ti.com> > > --- > > drivers/spi/Makefile | 1 + > > drivers/spi/davinci_spi.c | 205 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/spi/davinci_spi.h | 84 ++++++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 290 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 drivers/spi/davinci_spi.c > > create mode 100644 drivers/spi/davinci_spi.h > > > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/Makefile b/drivers/spi/Makefile > > index 824d8e7..07b9611 100644 > > --- a/drivers/spi/Makefile > > +++ b/drivers/spi/Makefile > > @@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ COBJS-$(CONFIG_MPC52XX_SPI) += mpc52xx_spi.o > > COBJS-$(CONFIG_MPC8XXX_SPI) += mpc8xxx_spi.o > > COBJS-$(CONFIG_MXC_SPI) += mxc_spi.o > > COBJS-$(CONFIG_SOFT_SPI) += soft_spi.o > > +COBJS-$(CONFIG_DAVINCI_SPI) += davinci_spi.o > > Should this list be kept sorted alphabetically? I.e. >
I'll arrange them alphabetically. > ... > COBJS-$(CONFIG_BFIN_SPI) += bfin_spi.o > COBJS-$(CONFIG_CF_SPI) += cf_spi.o > +COBJS-$(CONFIG_DAVINCI_SPI) += davinci_spi.o > COBJS-$(CONFIG_KIRKWOOD_SPI) += kirkwood_spi.o > ... > > ? > > > COBJS := $(COBJS-y) > > SRCS := $(COBJS:.o=.c) > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/davinci_spi.c b/drivers/spi/davinci_spi.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..1c988bb > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/spi/davinci_spi.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,205 @@ > ... > > +void spi_init() > ... > > +struct spi_slave *spi_setup_slave(unsigned int bus, unsigned int cs, > > + unsigned int max_hz, unsigned int mode) > ... > > +void spi_free_slave(struct spi_slave *slave) > .... > > +int spi_claim_bus(struct spi_slave *slave) > .... > > +void spi_release_bus(struct spi_slave *slave) > .... > > +int spi_xfer(struct spi_slave *slave, unsigned int bitlen, > > + const void *dout, void *din, unsigned long flags) > > I wonder if all (SPI API) functions from include/spi.h should be > implemented? I.e. do we need (dummy) functions for spi_cs_is_valid(), > spi_cs_activate() and spi_cs_deactivate(), too? Just in case a driver > does use them. > > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/davinci_spi.h b/drivers/spi/davinci_spi.h > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..b3bf916 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/spi/davinci_spi.h > > @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ > > +/* > > + * Register definitions for the DaVinci SPI Controller > > + */ > > Do we want a complete GPL header, like in the .c file, here, too? > > Do we want a protection against multiple inclusion > > #ifndef _DAVINCI_SPI_H_ > #define _DAVINCI_SPI_H_ > > in this header file? > > Best regards > > Dirk > _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
