Hi Nick, On Mon, Jan 04, 2010 at 15:17:51, Nick Thompson wrote: > On 23/12/09 07:44, Sudhakar Rajashekhara wrote: > > From: Sekhar Nori <nsek...@ti.com> > > > > This adds a driver for the SPI controller found on davinci > > based SoCs from Texas Instruments. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sekhar Nori <nsek...@ti.com> > > Signed-off-by: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar....@ti.com> > > --- > > drivers/spi/Makefile | 1 + > > drivers/spi/davinci_spi.c | 205 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/spi/davinci_spi.h | 84 ++++++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 290 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 drivers/spi/davinci_spi.c > > create mode 100644 drivers/spi/davinci_spi.h > > ... > > > diff --git a/drivers/spi/davinci_spi.h b/drivers/spi/davinci_spi.h > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..b3bf916 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/drivers/spi/davinci_spi.h > > @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@ > > +/* > > + * Register definitions for the DaVinci SPI Controller > > + */ > > + > > +/* Register offsets */ > > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_GCR0 0x0000 > > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_GCR1 0x0004 > > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_INT0 0x0008 > > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_LVL 0x000c > > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_FLG 0x0010 > > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_PC0 0x0014 > > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_PC1 0x0018 > > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_PC2 0x001c > > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_PC3 0x0020 > > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_PC4 0x0024 > > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_PC5 0x0028 > > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_DAT0 0x0038 > > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_DAT1 0x003c > > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_BUF 0x0040 > > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_EMU 0x0044 > > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_DELAY 0x0048 > > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_DEF 0x004c > > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_FMT0 0x0050 > > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_FMT1 0x0054 > > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_FMT2 0x0058 > > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_FMT3 0x005c > > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_INTVEC0 0x0060 > > +#define DAVINCI_SPI_INTVEC1 0x0064 > > I think this ought to be a C structure, rather than register offsets? >
I see that existing SPI drivers are not using structures for register defines. Off-late is there a shift in u-boot in favor of structures than macros for register definitions? Regards, Sudhakar _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
