Hi Heinrich, On 18 September 2017 at 05:13, Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.g...@gmx.de> wrote: > On 09/18/2017 12:59 AM, Simon Glass wrote: >> Add these so that we can build the EFI loader for sandbox. The values are >> for x86_64 so potentially bogus. But we don't support relocation within >> sandbox anyway. >> >> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> >> --- >> >> lib/efi_loader/efi_runtime.c | 3 +++ >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_runtime.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_runtime.c >> index ad7f3754bd..8ad1d2fc99 100644 >> --- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_runtime.c >> +++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_runtime.c >> @@ -48,6 +48,9 @@ static efi_status_t __efi_runtime EFIAPI >> efi_invalid_parameter(void); >> #include <asm/elf.h> >> #define R_RELATIVE R_386_RELATIVE >> #define R_MASK 0xffULL >> +#elif defined(CONFIG_SANDBOX) > > For the sandbox you should make your choice based on the host > architecture. I want to be able to work on my armv8 machine.
Sure, but I'm not sure how to do that. We need to know the host and adjust EFI accordingly I think. Perhaps something to do later. > >> +#define R_RELATIVE 8 > > You mean R_X86_64_RELATIVE (defined in arch/x86/include/asm/elf.h)? Regards, Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
